Pengguna:Ustad abu bakar pingg1r jalan/Bak pasir/Rujukan
This page intended to augment policy at Wiktionary:Entry layout#References. It is not in itself a policy.
Tujuan
[sunting]References are used to give credit to sources of information used here as well as to provide authority to such information. Importantly, references are not considered primary sources so do not count as “uses” for the purposes of Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Attestation. References are not mandatory for any entry, because Wiktionary includes terms based on their real-world usage, not inclusion in other dictionaries, encyclopedias and glossaries (and so on).
References are useful when they cover relevant information, such as pronunciation, etymology, context (and so on).
Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion state that terms that are used only in secondary sources are allowed for extinct languages as long as they come from an approved source. A list of approved sources must be maintained by editors of the language in question, and the rule only applies to extinct languages. The full policy is at Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Number of citations.
Etimologi
[sunting]Etymologies involving reconstructed terms or unclear and disputed etymons generally need sources. This is particularly pertinent to any etymology containing terms such as perhaps, probably or likely. Due to the limited space that Wiktionary etymologies occupy (a few sentences at best), Wikipedia-style inline citations are generally not needed to back up particular statements, and a simple L3 ===Reference=== section enumerating the sources would suffice, ideally by using some of the reference templates that take page/volume numbers, or link to an online version of the respective source. Editors are encouraged to create new reference templates for often-used references.
When there is a single source for etymology, or the etymology is widely accepted (so that author's name doesn't matter) it is not necessary to mention the author of the etymology. But if any doubts as to the origin of the explanation (or multiple etymologies) exist, it is necessary to mention the author/work. Newer works that are more up-to-date with modern scholarship have precedence over the old ones. In case when several equally plausible etymologies (theories of origin, reconstructions) exist, all of them have to be mentioned per NPOV policy. Etymologies that are doubtful can be tagged with the template {{}} (which takes a language code for the respective language, and optionally adds an entry for discussion in the Etymology Scriptorium). Particularly doubtful etymologies without any sources may be removed on sight.
Apa yang dianggap sebagai rujukan?
[sunting]Rujukan adalah sumber yang berasal dari tangan kedua/sumber sekunder. Sumber yang berasal dari tangan pertama/sumber primer, seperti penggunaan daripada sebuah kata/istilah disebut sebagai kutipan dan bukan sumber. Sehingga, penggunaan kata tersebut harus mengikuti panduan yang ada di Wiktionary:Quotations. Pencarian mesin seperti Google, Google Books, dan Google Scholar tidak termasuk sumber tangan kedua/sumber sekunder. Informasi-informasi yang penting dan relevan dari pencarian di mesin pencari, seperti contoh, yang telah disebutkan di atas sebaiknya ditaruh di di bagian rujukan atau kutipan.
Penggunaan
[sunting]Rujukan yang merujuk kepada suatu definisi yang spesifik atau bagian spesifik dari sebuah entri boleh jadi diberi dengan tanda <ref></ref>.
Reference list:
- They are under the ===References=== header
- There should then be a single <references/> tag (with no contents) , which will generate the list of references using the contents taken from all the <ref></ref> tags.
- References referring to an entry as a whole, or many parts of an entry, should be listed directly under the ===References=== header, usually preceded by a bullet (*). However, there is no formal policy on when to use the <ref></ref> syntax and when to use bulleted lists. See Help:Footnotes.
Wherever possible, references should include a link to the referenced material so that readers can see for themselves. Where this is not possible, e.g. because there is no available online version of it, please try and give enough details so that if the reader had the referenced material in front of them, they would know exactly where to look. For example:
- Girsch, Miller, Williams, The Middle English Dictionary, →ISBN, page 146
Though there are other details that could be given, such as the date of publication and the publisher, looking up the ISBN will quickly find these details.
References may be requested with the {{rfref}} template. This template should not be used for definitions, as definitions rely on primary, not secondary sources.
The templates for disputing definitions are:
- {{rfv-sense}} (for entries that may not meet WT:CFI#Attestation)
- and {{rfc-sense}} (for disputing accuracy rather than existence).
Contoh
[sunting]=== Rujukan ===
* {{R:Century 1911}}
* {{R:Webster 1913}}
akan memberikan
- “water”, pada The Century Dictionary […], New York, N.Y.: The Century Co., 1911, OCLC 867766587
- “water”, pada Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, Springfield, Mass.: G. & C. Merriam, 1913, OCLC 800618302